Skip to content
1 - /townhall/Kasich1/ -- Capitol Hill Town Hall Series
TRENDING:
Advertisement

Robert Ruehlman

Latest Stories

d90f4fef4230c703490f6a7067002c84.jpg

d90f4fef4230c703490f6a7067002c84.jpg

FILE - This photo made Thursday, Jan. 16, 2014, shows a sign advising motorists they may be monitored by traffic cameras in Elmwood Place, Ohio, after the cameras were removed by a ruling from Hamilton County Common Pleas Judge Robert Ruehlman. Judge Ruehlman ruled Thursday, Jan. 23 the village must refund nearly $1.8 million to drivers who received speeding camera tickets there, pending an appeal. (AP Photo/Al Behrman, file)

178125246144c803490f6a7067004ba5.jpg

178125246144c803490f6a7067004ba5.jpg

FILE - This photo made Thursday, Jan. 16, 2014, shows a sign advising motorists they may be monitored by traffic cameras in Elmwood Place, Ohio, after the cameras were removed by a ruling from Hamilton County Common Pleas Judge Robert Ruehlman. Judge Ruehlman ruled Thursday, Jan. 23 the village must refund nearly $1.8 million to drivers who received speeding camera tickets there, pending an appeal. (AP Photo/Al Behrman, file)

ed8151be8c534802490f6a706700bd24.jpg

ed8151be8c534802490f6a706700bd24.jpg

A sign advising motorists they may be monitored by traffic cameras remains in place Thursday, Jan. 16, 2014, in Elmwood Place, Ohio, after the cameras were removed by a ruling from Hamilton County Common Pleas Judge Robert Ruehlman. Judge Ruehlman is set to rule on Jan. 23 whether fines collected by the village must be returned. (AP Photo/Al Behrman)

90c0d43d8c534802490f6a706700cdc5.jpg

90c0d43d8c534802490f6a706700cdc5.jpg

A sign advising motorists they may be monitored by traffic cameras remains in place Thursday, Jan. 16, 2014, in Elmwood Place, Ohio, after the cameras were removed by a ruling from Hamilton County Common Pleas Judge Robert Ruehlman. Judge Ruehlman is set to rule on Jan. 23 whether fines collected by the village must be returned. (AP Photo/Al Behrman)