The administration’s goal in striking Iran-backed militants “is not ‘OK, game on, let’s just do this and go, you know, full-scale war against Iranian proxy groups in Iraq and Syria,’” according to Air Force Maj. Gen. Pat Ryder, the top Pentagon spokesman. At the same time, he says, the Pentagon won’t hold back from further retaliation against militants backed by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), who attack U.S. troops deployed in the region to prevent a resurgence of the Islamic State caliphate.
The comments Monday came after Iraq’s government sharply criticized the retaliatory U.S. strikes, claiming they killed civilians and members of the Iraqi military. Maj. Gen. Ryder responded that the targets were “command-and-control operation centers … [and] supply chain facilities … used by the IRGC and affiliated militias to attack U.S. forces.” The back-and-forth is at the center of soaring U.S.-Iran tensions, following U.S. airstrikes in response to the drone attack by Iran-backed Iraqi Shiite militias that killed three U.S. troops in Jordan on Jan. 28.
We’re closely tracking this, as well as charges by Biden opponents that his failed engagement diplomacy with Tehran prior to the Israel-Hamas war fueled Iran’s current aggression. Former President Donald Trump asserts his “maximum pressure” approach was more effective, claiming Iran even called to warn him ahead of time when its proxies carried out strikes against American forces in retaliation for the 2020 U.S. strike that killed Iranian commander Gen. Qassim Soleimani.